HACKED BY CYBER-ATTACK - ALPERENBTN Forum Index HACKED BY CYBER-ATTACK - ALPERENBTN
HACKED BY CYBER-ATTACK - ALPERENBTN
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Padre Island N'tl Seashore May Get Five New Wells

 
This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    HACKED BY CYBER-ATTACK - ALPERENBTN Forum Index -> HACKED FOR ISLAM AND HZ.MOHAMMED
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
tyler
Site Admin


Joined: 09 Aug 2004
Posts: 954
Location: Corpus Christi

PostPosted: Mon Nov 29, 2004 10:01 am    Post subject: Padre Island N'tl Seashore May Get Five New Wells Reply with quote

Here is the link to the story from Saturday's Caller Times:

http://www.caller.com/ccct/local_news/article/0,1641,CCCT_811_3358282,00.html
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Guest






PostPosted: Mon Nov 29, 2004 12:05 pm    Post subject: More Than That Reply with quote

Actually, the PINS's November 2004 Environmental Assessment says we may expect more than just those 5 wells to commence this winter and spring. The 5 the linked article mentions are just those at the Dunn-Peach site, which is accessed off the beach at MP 6.9. Also discussed briefly in the EA are the 2 wells, Lemon and Lemon Seed, which the PINS previously authorized at MP 12.5, and another well called the Novus Manzano, which would be somewhere near the Dunn-Peach wells. Although the latest EA has a picture of the Dunn-Murdock #1 well on the current EA's cover, and the last EA for the first Dunn-Peach well discusses the possiblity of redrilling the Dunn-Murdock #1 well at Yarborough Pass (MP 15), the new EA doesn't say if or when that would happen. Anyway, look for 8, maybe 9 more drilling operations over the next few months, and all kinds of big rigs on the beach as a result. Sad
Back to top
rabbit
Member Order of The White Shrimper Boots


Joined: 11 Aug 2004
Posts: 715
Location: Flour Bluff

PostPosted: Tue Nov 30, 2004 11:53 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think the item I read said the US uses 1 billion cubic feet of gas a day and the gas under the island was supose to amount to about 1 million cubic feet. Confused Either these figures were wrong or somebodys spending a lot of money for less than one days worth of gas. Mad
_________________
Fishing and Kayaking its a rough life but somebody has to do it. Smile
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
FlakMan
Honorary Bluffian


Joined: 11 Aug 2004
Posts: 257
Location: Portland, Texas

PostPosted: Tue Nov 30, 2004 12:27 pm    Post subject: USA Gas Usage and PINS Gas Reserves Reply with quote

The USA currently uses 21.9 Tcf (that's trillions of ft3) of gas per year. On the streets here in Corpus BNP has not found anything significant yet. They have lost significant $$ so far. I expect they will be luckly to find 10 to 20 Bcf (billions of ft3).

One thing to remember. The federal government did not buy the minerals just the land. BNP has the right to drill these wells as long as they do it responsibly.
_________________
Ahh sand between my toes!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Bluffer
Member Order of The White Shrimper Boots


Joined: 15 Aug 2004
Posts: 780
Location: The Bluff...Anyone wanna buy some fresh shrimp?

PostPosted: Wed Dec 01, 2004 8:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Im 4 it, we need to utilize the resources we have right here in TX. EPA stronger than ever on polluting.
_________________
Fish hard, fish the Bluff. Surrounded by water!
-A quaint little drinking village with a fishing problem-
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
cjlandry
Horse Mullet


Joined: 07 Sep 2004
Posts: 279
Location: Corpus Christi, TX

PostPosted: Sat Dec 04, 2004 9:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Everyone do us all a favor and post any problems you see with the drilling operations.

I've been involved first-hand with keeping drilling operations clean in Wildlife Refuges and other sensitive habitats, and I'm proud to have been a part of it. I've been in the oilfield for many, many years and the U.S. operations are the cleanest in the world.

I'm in Egypt as I type this, and these ****s could learn a lot about environmentally responsible drilling from Americans.

And don't forget that most Oilfield employees, from the highest executives to the roughnecks who do the dirty work, love fishing and hunting as much as we do. Don't let CNN and other media outlets tell you otherwise.
_________________
Chad Landry

"Whiskey for my men, and beer for my horses"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Guest






PostPosted: Sat Dec 04, 2004 10:38 am    Post subject: No Bad Words for Wells Reply with quote

cjlandry, I hear you. I was a mudlogger for Baroid on wells all around South Texas before taking a job with the Bureau of Natural Gas at what is now the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, for which I wrote EISs on natural gas gathering and transportation systems and LNG plants. Later, during 23 years with the USFWS, I reviewed hundreds of well applications, including those drilled on wildlife refuges and all over the bays. These wells did some damage to the environment, but nearly everyone cooperated, from the roughnecks to the CEOs and bureaucrats, to limit that damage and to clean up afterwards. The expectation is that BNG and the PINS will try just as hard to do the same with every well at the National Seashore.

My unresolved issue with the PINS drilling is with driving along the beach to get to the wells, not with the wells themselves, much less with letting BNG deliver the much-needed gas to this country and share some of the profits with the private mineral owners and Texas' schools. Connecting and extending the existing roads behind the dunes, while undoubtably causing environmental damage that must be minimized and mitigated just like at the well sites, seems a reasonable tradeoff for keeping the beach safe for enjoyment by visitors, human as well as endangered wildlife.
Back to top
FlakMan
Honorary Bluffian


Joined: 11 Aug 2004
Posts: 257
Location: Portland, Texas

PostPosted: Sat Dec 04, 2004 1:03 pm    Post subject: PINS Drilling Access Reply with quote

If BNP cannot drive behind the dunes it is only becuase they are forced to drive on the beach. I expect the many regulatory offices that BNP must comply with will not allow behind the duneline access likely because of "wetlands" issues.
_________________
Ahh sand between my toes!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Guest






PostPosted: Sat Dec 04, 2004 2:43 pm    Post subject: One of Several Reasons Reply with quote

FlakMan, wetland issues are indeed raised in the PINS Environmental Assessments among the excuses it gives for not giving the off-beach alternative what is known in the courts as a "hard look." Wetland issues are hardly unique; every Corps of Engineers well permit I ever reviewed for the FWS had to have wetland and/or navigable waters issues in order for that agency to have permit jurisdiction over them. In fact, well access roads and pipeline routes impact wetlands so routinely that the Corps issued Nationwide Permits for handling many of them without the public ever knowing; the existing and proposed BNG operations at PINS use these, for example, because, guess what, they impact wetlands, too.

What I keep doing when I comment to PINS on its EAs is to point out that despite several problems, like wetland impacts, to be overcome, there are advantages to the back-dune alternative that more than offset the unavoidable disadvantages, such as scaring the kids, turning off the tourists and crushing sea turtle eggs, of driving on the beach. Until the PINS completes an EA describing in detail and showing on a map where a reasonable attempt has been made to find a back-dune route that avoids wetlands and mitigates their loss to the extent practicable, just like any Corps-permitted well elsewhere would, I'm not going to stop questioning the excuses. One of these days, PINS may stop dismissing the alternative before giving it the serious consideration (that "hard look") the law requires.

This is such a complex and important issue that I don't want to hog the board further. Please continue to send in your comments to this forum, and try to get a look at the November 2004 EA so you can comment directly to PINS on that. Drop a request to my addy and I'll send you a copy of what I sent PINS this last go-round. jfrench@stx.rr.com
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    HACKED BY CYBER-ATTACK - ALPERENBTN Forum Index -> HACKED FOR ISLAM AND HZ.MOHAMMED All times are GMT - 7 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group