 |
Corpusfishing.com Fishing Reports and information for the Coastal Bend
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
riofrio Flour Bluffian in training
Joined: 26 Oct 2006 Posts: 352 Location: Padre Island
|
Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2018 7:09 am Post subject: Call to Arms |
|
|
Please comment to the TCEQ if you like to fish on the Texas Coast.....
The Port of Corpus Christi Authority of Nueces County proposes to operate a desalination facility on Harbor Island near Port Aransas with an effluent discharge outfall 300ft from the shoreline into the Corpus Christi Channel at a rate not to exceed 95,600,000 gallons per day (see application details link below). The location of this discharge is within the Redfish Bay State Scientific Area, an environmentally sensitive ecosystem. Numerous aquatic species, including but not limited to: blue crabs, menhaden, flounder species, shrimp species, red drum, trout, croaker, sea turtles, pinfish, pigfish, gafftopsail catfish, tarpon, tripletail and ling, utilize this coastal pass to reach their preferred habitats and food sources during various life stages.
The combination of increased water temperature and brine effluent at the discharge outfall could create an area of low dissolved oxygen content and pose significant risk to all manners of aquatic life, particularly winter spawning aggregations of sheepshead.
CCA Texas opposes this discharge permit for reasons mentioned above and we encourage our membership to lend their voice in opposition. You can file your personal comments by clicking here. Be sure to reference Permit No. WQ0005253000. Thank you for your efforts to protect and conserve our marine resources.
Comment Link to TCEQ
http://www14.tceq.texas.gov/epic/eComment/
Application Details
https://img1.wsimg.com/blobby/go/c43bc452-5b67-4b56-8dd1-774f844a33c1/downloads/1cq7ej5p8_794269.pdf |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
speckled.trout Full Grown Flour Bluffian
Joined: 30 Aug 2012 Posts: 1190
|
Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2018 8:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'm interested, I did notice the post did say "could create" are there studies that I could look at that contribute to the decision of the cca.
Thanks
Mike |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
hillcountryfisherman Pony Mullet
Joined: 15 Dec 2017 Posts: 58
|
Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2018 8:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
I think quite the opposite will happen. Discharges at lakes as well as coastal bay systems create a lot of oxygen and also keep the water flow and current moving for better fishing.
Just because C.C.A does not agree, does not make it the gospel.
There is several reasons that S.E.A. was formed years ago, this thinking by C.C.A. is one example why S.E.A. is a great fisherman friendly organization.
Lots of locals with good intentions have gotten in trouble fishing at the discharge up the Oso where Barney Seal Power Plant has its discharge . ESPECIALLY IN THE WINTER WHERE THE WATER IS WARMER. [ HUGH TROUT ]
This will become a hot place to fish during the winter months !! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Tyler Site Admin

Joined: 06 Mar 2006 Posts: 12864
|
Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2018 8:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
hillcountryfisherman wrote: |
Lots of locals with good intentions have gotten in trouble fishing at the discharge up the Oso where Barney Seal Power Plant has its discharge . ESPECIALLY IN THE WINTER WHERE THE WATER IS WARMER. [ HUGH TROUT ]
This will become a hot place to fish during the winter months !! |
Brine effluent is not the same as the warm water discharge at a power plant/ _________________ Like Corpusfishing.com on Facebook! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
speckled.trout Full Grown Flour Bluffian
Joined: 30 Aug 2012 Posts: 1190
|
Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2018 8:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
Water temperature can and is controlled by heat exchangers and cooling ponds
currently being done by refineries and power plants. Brine can be controlled by pumping water from the GOM into the brine warm water to lower temp. and salt levels before pumping back into the bay system after both reach required levels. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bulldog1935 Full Grown Flour Bluffian

Joined: 07 Feb 2017 Posts: 1061 Location: downtown Bulverde, Texas
|
Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2018 9:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
But the rivers running dry because of population growth and groundwater usage will certainly kill the estuaries, just like they did to the once largest mangrove estuary on the planet (universe) within our lifetimes -
- due to southern CA water usage - the mouth of the Colorado River in the Sea of Cortez.
The population of Texas is projected to double every 20 years.
If we don't get ahead of the curve, we will kill the rivers and coastal estuaries.

Last edited by bulldog1935 on Fri Dec 21, 2018 3:56 pm; edited 2 times in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
HungerBuster Flour Bluffian in training
Joined: 07 Mar 2006 Posts: 371
|
Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2018 10:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
Well for this year, the discharge would be virtually irrelevant with all of the inflows into the bays from the fall rains. Ironically, if it were up and running now, it might actually be a good thing. But on the other hand, brine is a hard cookie to crack (no pun intended). It can be good. It can be bad. But if we need water... _________________ Fish ON! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
hillcountryfisherman Pony Mullet
Joined: 15 Dec 2017 Posts: 58
|
Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2018 12:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yes you are correct, Corpus should have done this years ago. Droughts that effect Lake Mathis as well as Choke will always be around. Mary Rhodes pipeline as well can be a trickle if we get years back to back with out substantial rainfall.
Besides holding ponds that will benefit some wildlife, it has also been used for irrigation for years.
Quality Water is the biggest challenge Texans will have as time goes on.
I have two 400 ' plus wells, thank god, with just a few straws or neighbors with in 1/2 mile. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bulldog1935 Full Grown Flour Bluffian

Joined: 07 Feb 2017 Posts: 1061 Location: downtown Bulverde, Texas
|
Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2018 3:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
yes, but those wells take water from Turtle Creek, Verde Creek, and Guadalupe River.
It's great for you, but it all adds up - actually subtracts - downstream.
We must have desalination (and water pipelines) for a determined fraction of our municipal water supplies, because the ground water cannot sustain the draw. Surface reservoirs are limited help because of evaporation losses.
I've used the example before that the Guadalupe stopped once at source of the Trinity seepage aquifer, which takes up to 10 cfs from the river (Spring Branch just above Canyon Lake) - that happened in 1955, the drought of record.
But from 2005 to 2015, the Guadalupe stopped there in 7 of those 10 years.
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
BayFly Full Grown Flour Bluffian
Joined: 02 Sep 2014 Posts: 1707 Location: Austin/Flour Bluff
|
Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2018 6:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Why would it not be best if the desalination plants were established on the barrier islands, so their discharge could be directly into the Gulf? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
rodandroll Full Grown Flour Bluffian
Joined: 17 Jan 2007 Posts: 1814 Location: Kerrville, Tx
|
Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2018 10:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
bulldog1935 wrote: | yes, but those wells take water from Turtle Creek, Verde Creek, and Guadalupe River.
It's great for you, but it all adds up - actually subtracts - downstream.
We must have desalination (and water pipelines) for a determined fraction of our municipal water supplies, because the ground water cannot sustain the draw. Surface reservoirs are limited help because of evaporation losses.
I've used the example before that the Guadalupe stopped once at source of the Trinity seepage aquifer, which takes up to 10 cfs from the river (Spring Branch just above Canyon Lake) - that happened in 1955, the drought of record.
But from 2005 to 2015, the Guadalupe stopped there in 7 of those 10 years.
 |
Sounds like downstream greed for water generated in the hill country. I see no reason we can't use the water we generate. Perhaps we should demand that those downstream send some water back to us for all of the water they have received from us over many years. _________________ Now that food has replaced my sex life I can't even get into my own pants!!!!!!!!
Even duct tape can't fix stupid ... but it can muffle the sound!!! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bulldog1935 Full Grown Flour Bluffian

Joined: 07 Feb 2017 Posts: 1061 Location: downtown Bulverde, Texas
|
Posted: Sat Dec 22, 2018 5:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
Nor is there a reason to stick our head in the sand. By eminent domain, the water belongs to the legislative water authorities - in your specific case, GBRA, et.al.
They're working on that. SAWS is working on a reservoir near Victoria with a water pipeline to send water up to SA - that pipeline will be in place when they can buy desal potable water.
TECQ also mandates all parking lot permits in acquifer recharge zone has a catch and filter system to put runoff back into the aquifer.
I think we'll see more and more systems where runoff is captured and stored in places other than surface reservoirs.
Increasing population (doubling every 20 years) is going to demand more water than any of us can imagine. It's not greed, it's known need, and watering people is always going to get legislative priority.
Kerrville growth is a drain - you don't generate water, you use it, exactly the same as the people downstream.
Likewise, Austin (Fredericksburg and Lampasas) growth will eventually kill the Lavaca bay systems.
If we get after it now, we can save both rivers and coastal estuaries.
In California, they waited to start on desalination until they had already killed their downstream estuary - Texas can do better - our grandchildren can have both rivers and coastal estuaries.
Last edited by bulldog1935 on Thu Dec 27, 2018 9:05 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
rodandroll Full Grown Flour Bluffian
Joined: 17 Jan 2007 Posts: 1814 Location: Kerrville, Tx
|
Posted: Sat Dec 22, 2018 9:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
bulldog1935 wrote: | Nor is there a reason to stick our head in the sand. By eminent domain, the water belongs to the legislative water authorities - in your specific case, GBRA. |
Nope, for once you are wrong. Amazing isn't it. In Kerr County it is the UGRA. This time do some research look at the pdf map. It's readily available to anyone with a google search. The GBRA has been trying to steal our water for years
bulldog1935 wrote: | Kerrville growth is a drain - you don't generate water, you use it, exactly the same as the people downstream.
|
Wrong again, a second time, must be a record. Well I guess you are partially right in that I personally don't generate any water. I tend to leave that to God and nature. But, water is definitely "generated" in Kerr County and those that live here should be able to use it first, instead of those downstream trying to steal it all the time. Perhaps those downstream should come up with a way of "generating" water to deal with their problems instead of trying to steal from us here in Kerr County. Desalinization plants perhaps? _________________ Now that food has replaced my sex life I can't even get into my own pants!!!!!!!!
Even duct tape can't fix stupid ... but it can muffle the sound!!! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bulldog1935 Full Grown Flour Bluffian

Joined: 07 Feb 2017 Posts: 1061 Location: downtown Bulverde, Texas
|
Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2018 4:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
whiskey is for drinking and water is for fighting over
from Lamar Smith down, all my representatives have been hearing about the need for desalination for more than 10 years.
Currently, Cape Coral FL, Yuma AZ, and El Paso are the only municipal desalination water plants, but there are are almost 40 in the works on 3 coasts.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Desalination_by_country#United_States
FWIW, where I've lived for 20+ years, a manicured lawn has always been antisocial.
Back to the first point, of course Kerville growth is a drain on God's water supply, and everything down to Aransas NWR.
For everyone else, note the attitude, those who golf uphill should be allowed to kill the coastal estuary - bet y'all didn't know California was filled with redneck bile.
People are always going to get legislative priority for water supply, and the population is going to grow - our biggest growth factor is equities moving from CA - if we want to save the rivers and estuaries, we have to plan ahead. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bulldog1935 Full Grown Flour Bluffian

Joined: 07 Feb 2017 Posts: 1061 Location: downtown Bulverde, Texas
|
Posted: Mon Dec 24, 2018 4:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yes, I post when I have something to contribute.
I know every bridge you live anywhere near, have watched flood and drought there for the past 40 years. And every bridge within 100 miles of home.
I've watched flood lift flagstone to form holes and blocky dams - our hill country version of natural lakes - and fished them from inception to maturity.
I've also watched the connecting land being subdivided, and neighborhoods slowly saturate the land between all our rivers.
There's no stopping any of these forces, except the combination of growth and drought does stop our rivers, and the frequency has increased to the alarm point.
I have a pretty good conservation resume. Been on the board, VP or committee chair of Trout Unlimited since the '90s, and I Run Trout in the Classroom for Texas - 25 schools this year. I drive 1000 volunteer miles for the footwork.
I also hang with smart people. My friends are on the advisory board for TCEQ and TPWD.
Efforts to save our rivers will also save our coastal estuaries.

Last edited by bulldog1935 on Fri Dec 28, 2018 6:39 am; edited 2 times in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|