Corpusfishing.com Forum Index Corpusfishing.com
Fishing Reports and information for the Coastal Bend
 

HOME | SITE INDEX | WEATHER | LINKS | TIDES | BUY FISHING BOOKS | BOB HALL CAM | SFCCI| GUIDES                             
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Fishermen Robbed Near The JFK Bridge
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Corpusfishing.com Forum Index -> General Saltwater Fishing Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Stinger-A
Flour Bluffian in training


Joined: 17 Mar 2011
Posts: 300
Location: Alice, Tx

PostPosted: Thu Jul 05, 2012 11:16 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

As I have not seen any home searches or sweeps preformed without a warrant or consent, I'm guessing it stops there. You have valid points about intrusive searches and your 4th amendment right. You have the right to refuse a search, however so does the guy who has four kilos of drugs in the trunk. The officer has to determine who is refusing the search because they are invoking thier 4th amendment right, and who is just trying hide something. I'm not a cop, but I believe they have a tough job, so I choose to make it easy for them and allow a search so they can focus on real bad guys.

Stinger-A
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
wallhanger
Member White Shrimper Boot Club


Joined: 13 Jan 2009
Posts: 765

PostPosted: Thu Jul 05, 2012 11:51 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

but I believe they have a tough job, so I choose to make it easy for them and allow a search so they can focus on real bad guys.

EXACTLY!

These individuals that choose to make it difficult also pave the way for the scum bags to argue the same way.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
BishopRyan
Pony Mullet


Joined: 11 Jul 2011
Posts: 78
Location: Corpus Christi

PostPosted: Thu Jul 05, 2012 4:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

wallhanger wrote:
but I believe they have a tough job, so I choose to make it easy for them and allow a search so they can focus on real bad guys.

EXACTLY!

These individuals that choose to make it difficult also pave the way for the scum bags to argue the same way.
...and they also pave the way for big government, illegal unwarranted search and seizures, socialism, marshal law and so forth.

Fighting bad guys isn't a justification for limiting the individual freedoms and privacy of law abiding citizens.

You can't (shouldn't) arbitrarily legislate against innocent people simply because its hard to catch the bad guys.

Thank god our founding fathers didn't see things this way.

Its also tough for the government to pay their bills and balance the budget why not hand over half your paycheck...you know to make it easier on them.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
flounderjig
Horse Mullet


Joined: 12 Nov 2009
Posts: 115

PostPosted: Thu Jul 05, 2012 4:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Right On Bishop Ryan.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Stinger-A
Flour Bluffian in training


Joined: 17 Mar 2011
Posts: 300
Location: Alice, Tx

PostPosted: Thu Jul 05, 2012 5:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

That's a huge jump you just made between getting pulled over, and marshal law!! The views you share seem to be far fetched for me. Our founding fathers were great thinkers for thier time, that's why we have amendments these days, times change. I already pay half my paycheck to them, in the form of taxes. And if it keeps me safe and supplies bullets for our soldiers and or police, I'm glad too. Being I hate political debate, ill bow out and bid you tight lines fellow fisherman. Take care.

Stinger-A[/b]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
BishopRyan
Pony Mullet


Joined: 11 Jul 2011
Posts: 78
Location: Corpus Christi

PostPosted: Thu Jul 05, 2012 5:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Stinger-A wrote:
That's a huge jump you just made between getting pulled over, and marshal law!! The views you share seem to be far fetched for me. Our founding fathers were great thinkers for thier time, that's why we have amendments these days, times change. I already pay half my paycheck to them, in the form of taxes. And if it keeps me safe and supplies bullets for our soldiers and or police, I'm glad too. Being I hate political debate, ill bow out and bid you tight lines fellow fisherman. Take care.

Stinger-A[/b]
I mean no ill will friendo. It was a jump but our freedoms and right to privacies have been diminished considerably in the last decade. Its not as big of a jump as you might think.

There's just a difference between being safe and over governing as a result of fear mongering.

There are approx. 7 violent crimes per 1k residents in CC. I'm all for being safe but I shouldn't have to give up a large percentage of my freedoms because they need help policing less than a 1% violent crime rate.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
JTwantsaRED
Horse Mullet


Joined: 22 Apr 2009
Posts: 104
Location: the Oso is almost my backyard

PostPosted: Thu Jul 05, 2012 8:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Deleted
_________________
“Tomorrow is the most important thing in life. Comes into us at midnight very clean. It's perfect when it arrives and it puts itself in our hands. It hopes we've learned something from yesterday.” -John Wayne


Last edited by JTwantsaRED on Fri Jul 06, 2012 5:52 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mike3887
Finger Mullet


Joined: 16 Jun 2012
Posts: 37
Location: Austin, TX

PostPosted: Thu Jul 05, 2012 9:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I don't really see anyone here bashing law enforcement.

Bishop, I can understand your argument and there is indeed a fine line between too much, and just enough governing. This is why case law is made constantly. It sounds like you may have run into officers in the past that wore pants that were too big for themselves. I assure you, not all are that way but I have dealt with them as well. It doesn't look like you and I will agree on blood searches for suspected drunk drivers, however I will say that I firmly believe many people who think of driving drunk are at least thinking twice about it and maybe finding a sober way around town during 'no refusal' periods. I don't think anyone would argue that less drunks equals less deaths, especially in Austin where fatalities are on pace for an alarming historical record this year. I don't know of case law on blood warrants yet but it will be interesting when its made. There are arguments to both sides.

As far as the random stops, they are allowed by law to check for drivers license violations. It is imperative that officers not abuse powers provided to them by the state and federal government during said stops. I also believe in everyone having the right to refuse searches. I have been refused searches on cars that I knew had dope inside. It's my job to find the probable cause to search that car and if I don't have it then my view on it is I'll get you next time. The game has to be played fairly and just like with any game; you win some, you lose some.

There is no telltale sign of who is and who is not a criminal. One of my good friends, and ex-partner on the street, who was an officer in Austin was murdered just a few months ago on a shoplifting call by a kid who had a couple of misdemeanors on his record. Point is, you don't know who you're dealing with until you're dealing with them. This goes for the random stops as well. Sometimes it's a banger, sometimes a dealer, sometimes a granny, and usually an average Joe. I think the important thing is to keep patience while a job is being done. I don't get the impression that you're a cop hater or disrespectful by any means judging by your posts; you said yourself that you're generally in favor of the stops. You just want to be able to exercise your rights without scrutiny and I can definitely appreciate that. This is America dammit, more power to you.

Mike
_________________
Keep your friends close, and your enemies guessing...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
SharkBait
Full Grown Flour Bluffian


Joined: 07 Aug 2011
Posts: 1790
Location: >*)\\\><( Flour Bluff Texas, Earth, Milky Way

PostPosted: Thu Jul 05, 2012 9:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

wish more police officers were like mike3887...
_________________
http://www.youtube.com/user/Shark456Bait/featured
*******************************************
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bluffrat
Pony Mullet


Joined: 02 Jul 2012
Posts: 58
Location: flour bluff of course

PostPosted: Thu Jul 05, 2012 10:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

same here, and i would hope a police officer wouldnt skip a 911 call based on something exspressed on the internet.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Johninaustin
Full Grown Flour Bluffian


Joined: 03 Jun 2007
Posts: 1113

PostPosted: Thu Jul 05, 2012 10:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I've learned one thing on the internet. When someone throws out terms such as "Statist" or "Police State or whines about searches,

It pretty much guarantees they are dumber than a bag of carrots. Save the Anti-Authority BS for your local sovereign buddies.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Johninaustin
Full Grown Flour Bluffian


Joined: 03 Jun 2007
Posts: 1113

PostPosted: Thu Jul 05, 2012 10:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

mike3887 wrote:
I don't really see anyone here bashing law enforcement.

Bishop, I can understand your argument and there is indeed a fine line between too much, and just enough governing. This is why case law is made constantly. It sounds like you may have run into officers in the past that wore pants that were too big for themselves. I assure you, not all are that way but I have dealt with them as well. It doesn't look like you and I will agree on blood searches for suspected drunk drivers, however I will say that I firmly believe many people who think of driving drunk are at least thinking twice about it and maybe finding a sober way around town during 'no refusal' periods. I don't think anyone would argue that less drunks equals less deaths, especially in Austin where fatalities are on pace for an alarming historical record this year. I don't know of case law on blood warrants yet but it will be interesting when its made. There are arguments to both sides.

As far as the random stops, they are allowed by law to check for drivers license violations. It is imperative that officers not abuse powers provided to them by the state and federal government during said stops. I also believe in everyone having the right to refuse searches. I have been refused searches on cars that I knew had dope inside. It's my job to find the probable cause to search that car and if I don't have it then my view on it is I'll get you next time. The game has to be played fairly and just like with any game; you win some, you lose some.

There is no telltale sign of who is and who is not a criminal. One of my good friends, and ex-partner on the street, who was an officer in Austin was murdered just a few months ago on a shoplifting call by a kid who had a couple of misdemeanors on his record. Point is, you don't know who you're dealing with until you're dealing with them. This goes for the random stops as well. Sometimes it's a banger, sometimes a dealer, sometimes a granny, and usually an average Joe. I think the important thing is to keep patience while a job is being done. I don't get the impression that you're a cop hater or disrespectful by any means judging by your posts; you said yourself that you're generally in favor of the stops. You just want to be able to exercise your rights without scrutiny and I can definitely appreciate that. This is America dammit, more power to you.

Mike


Jaime Padron was a good friend and a great guy to work with. He will be missed. Crying or Very sad
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Johninaustin
Full Grown Flour Bluffian


Joined: 03 Jun 2007
Posts: 1113

PostPosted: Thu Jul 05, 2012 10:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

BishopRyan wrote:
Stinger-A wrote:
That's a huge jump you just made between getting pulled over, and marshal law!! The views you share seem to be far fetched for me. Our founding fathers were great thinkers for thier time, that's why we have amendments these days, times change. I already pay half my paycheck to them, in the form of taxes. And if it keeps me safe and supplies bullets for our soldiers and or police, I'm glad too. Being I hate political debate, ill bow out and bid you tight lines fellow fisherman. Take care.

Stinger-A[/b]
I mean no ill will friendo. It was a jump but our freedoms and right to privacies have been diminished considerably in the last decade. Its not as big of a jump as you might think.

There's just a difference between being safe and over governing as a result of fear mongering.

There are approx. 7 violent crimes per 1k residents in CC. I'm all for being safe but I shouldn't have to give up a large percentage of my freedoms because they need help policing less than a 1% violent crime rate.


If you were being honest, you would mention that that number is incredibly high. So high in fact Corpus falls at #6 out of 100 cities in terms of safety.

The OVERALL crime rate is 57.48. That's just nuts for a town with only 300K residents. Heck, you are getting close to numbers found in the suburbs of Detroit. Some of suburbs in fact, have rates LOWER than Corpus.

Let's look at that violent crime rate for a moment. The Texas AVERAGE is 4.50. Austin, with a population almost 4 times that of Corpus, is only 4.83. How does that "Corpus is only 7" look to you now? .

Not comfortable with statistics?

Take a gander in the archives and count the "somebody stole my (Fill in the blank) etc posts over the past year then tell me crime is not a problem.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
JTwantsaRED
Horse Mullet


Joined: 22 Apr 2009
Posts: 104
Location: the Oso is almost my backyard

PostPosted: Fri Jul 06, 2012 6:29 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

After reading Mike's post I realized that I was just venting and should have kept my inappropriate statement making mouth shut. Mike's right. My apologies to the forum. Was just peeved and should have waited. Should have waited and thought a lil longer before saying anything. I would never not make a call, and I promise you I'm not the fat, lazy, inept officer that this town thinks we all are. My point should have been this.....I agree with having a CHL, limited government, and I know that there are bad cops out there. Hearing "well that last cop didn't do a d@mn thing..." all the time just gets old that's all.
_________________
“Tomorrow is the most important thing in life. Comes into us at midnight very clean. It's perfect when it arrives and it puts itself in our hands. It hopes we've learned something from yesterday.” -John Wayne
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
obsessed
Full Grown Flour Bluffian


Joined: 08 Mar 2006
Posts: 1200

PostPosted: Fri Jul 06, 2012 6:58 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

He who shall not be mentioned wrote:
wish more police officers were like mike3887...


i hope Mike doesn't stop suddenly! Razz Laughing Laughing

j/k, SB....hope yall have a great weekend, watch out for bad weather cuz i'm headed down in a few hours! Embarassed
_________________
Trophy whitetail and exotic hunts on some of the finest ranches Texas has to offer, www.mcoutfitterstexas.com
www.baffinbayrodandgun.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Corpusfishing.com Forum Index -> General Saltwater Fishing Forum All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Page 5 of 6

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group