| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
PATHFINDER22 Horse Mullet

Joined: 09 Nov 2008 Posts: 181
|
Posted: Sat Feb 12, 2011 11:19 pm Post subject: Cabin in land cut? |
|
|
| From what iv'e herd your not able to obtain a permit to build a new cabin in the land cut. If thats the case are people able to sale there permit/cabin and if so does any one know how much cabins are selling for there. Just curius? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DBE1982 Flour Bluffian in training
Joined: 15 Apr 2006 Posts: 376
|
Posted: Sat Feb 12, 2011 11:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Every few years the state will auction off a few permits for new cabins, locations are pretty assigned to a general area (areas vary each time). Last time permits went for 20-30K + (20K around emmords hole area, 30K+ further south). You are allowed to sell a cabin, however finding one that people are willing to sell is like a needle in a haystack.. When we were looking for ours (2004), we contacted every cabin owner from just north of baffin bay, through 10 miles into the land cut, only 2 people were willing to sell, and actually 1 of them would only sell half the cabin to create a partnership.. We bought the only 1 available outright. We paid $40K for ours, the cabin is 12' x 24', with a 10'x20' deck in the back, roughly the same up front, 4' of deck down one side, and 10' down the other, pier is about 30' long with a T that is about 25' wide.. We are at Marker 17, very first cabin south of baffin on the east side, a couple hundred yds off the ICW. At 40K this place was ROUGH, and actually still is, we have dumped alot of $$$ into the pilings/pier/deck just to make it safe, and now will begin attacking the cabin. You can contact the state and get a list of all owners of cabins(its public info) and there will be contact info, just start giving them a ring and see what ya find. Be prepared though, these things are far from cheap!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
PATHFINDER22 Horse Mullet

Joined: 09 Nov 2008 Posts: 181
|
Posted: Sun Feb 13, 2011 9:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Thanks. Thats exactly what I wanted to know |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
BALZTOWAL Full Grown Flour Bluffian
Joined: 29 Aug 2007 Posts: 1141 Location: CORPUS
|
Posted: Sun Feb 13, 2011 9:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
| From what I heard, the Kennedy Foundation aka Catholic Church sued the State and won. Now all the cabins on the west side of the ditch eventually have to be moved basically claiming this was the Kennedy ranch before the intracoastal was built so the bank is theres. . They may be some opportunity for you if some of these people don't want to or can't rebuild. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
manuel9622 Horse Mullet

Joined: 13 Mar 2008 Posts: 234 Location: SAN ANTONIO
|
Posted: Sun Feb 13, 2011 9:45 am Post subject: landcut cabin |
|
|
| The Texas General Land Office governs the cabins and they work out of Texas A&M Corpus Christi. We have been there a few times to take care of business about our cabin. My dad built the first cabin back in the day when you didn't need permits about 45 years ago. I am 39 years old now and have been going to cabin since I was one year old. Our original cabin was at Marker 15 in the landcut but in 1987 we have relocated down to the southern end of the landcut where it opens up to the bay closer to Port Mansfield. We launch out of Port Mansfield because of a shorter boat ride. There is a newletter that comes out and you can find on the GLO website. Good luck on your search for a cabin and i'm sure you will enjoy it like I do. Alot of memories are made out there and I never get tired of going there. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
BluffYakker Horse Mullet

Joined: 21 Jun 2008 Posts: 164 Location: the bluff
|
Posted: Sun Feb 13, 2011 1:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| BALZTOWAL wrote: | | From what I heard, the Kennedy Foundation aka Catholic Church sued the State and won. Now all the cabins on the west side of the ditch eventually have to be moved basically claiming this was the Kennedy ranch before the intracoastal was built so the bank is theres. . They may be some opportunity for you if some of these people don't want to or can't rebuild. |
is it now official that all cabins on the kennedy ranch side must be moved because i know they have been arguing about that for at least 30 years? if it is true then im sure a bunch of cabins/permits will be for sale soon simply because most people wont want to rebuild their cabins. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SaltyCuda Member White Shrimper Boot Club

Joined: 03 Nov 2009 Posts: 892 Location: Corpus
|
Posted: Tue Feb 15, 2011 11:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| BALZTOWAL wrote: | | From what I heard, the Kennedy Foundation aka Catholic Church sued the State and won. Now all the cabins on the west side of the ditch eventually have to be moved basically claiming this was the Kennedy ranch before the intracoastal was built so the bank is theres. . They may be some opportunity for you if some of these people don't want to or can't rebuild. |
I'm not buying it! The ranch tried to claim I was trespassing while hunting the El Toro spoil area inside the cut. Not the only time I ran into ranch patrol, I contacted the Land office beforehand and they informed me it was state land and I had a right to be there. The Ranch has been trying and succeeding in intimidating folks along that shoreline for many years. They have posted signs that determine where Ranch begins and where state land or waterway begins. I would want to see actual court documents before I believed anything said about Ranch ownwership.
Just my .02 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
layzday Pony Mullet
Joined: 30 Aug 2010 Posts: 64 Location: corpus christi
|
Posted: Wed Feb 16, 2011 8:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
[
I'm not buying it! The ranch tried to claim I was trespassing while hunting the El Toro spoil area inside the cut. Not the only time I ran into ranch patrol, I contacted the Land office beforehand and they informed me it was state land and I had a right to be there. The Ranch has been trying and succeeding in intimidating folks along that shoreline for many years. They have posted signs that determine where Ranch begins and where state land or waterway begins. I would want to see actual court documents before I believed anything said about Ranch ownwership.
Just my .02
I would like to see court doc too. From what the game wardens tell me the whole west side is ranch property and can't hunt it I think it's all bs cause i know the state owns tidle land, but last time I was down Thier the game wardens were all over me saying i was on ranch property around the el toro and cortada and our frist cabin was down near the 14 in the cut now we rebuilt and moved it Over to twin palms right before all this permit stuff went on[/quote] _________________ IF I DID NOT HAVE BAD LUCK I WOULD NOT HAVE ANY LUCK AT ALL!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
BALZTOWAL Full Grown Flour Bluffian
Joined: 29 Aug 2007 Posts: 1141 Location: CORPUS
|
Posted: Wed Feb 16, 2011 7:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I think the legislatures made it illegal to hunt El Toro. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DBE1982 Flour Bluffian in training
Joined: 15 Apr 2006 Posts: 376
|
Posted: Wed Feb 16, 2011 10:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| BALZTOWAL wrote: | | I think the legislatures made it illegal to hunt El Toro. |
they did... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
PATHFINDER22 Horse Mullet

Joined: 09 Nov 2008 Posts: 181
|
Posted: Fri Feb 18, 2011 6:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Thats alot of good info to look into before making any moves..Thanks |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SaltyCuda Member White Shrimper Boot Club

Joined: 03 Nov 2009 Posts: 892 Location: Corpus
|
Posted: Fri Feb 18, 2011 6:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| DBE1982 wrote: | | BALZTOWAL wrote: | | I think the legislatures made it illegal to hunt El Toro. |
they did... |
It's been a few years since I hunted El Toro. But I would still want to see the docs.
Most land along bodies of water are subject to changing boundries. Do we have any legal eagle types on this board? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
topdog15 Full Grown Flour Bluffian

Joined: 14 Jun 2006 Posts: 4566 Location: Flour Bluff
|
Posted: Sat Feb 19, 2011 11:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| SaltyCuda wrote: | | DBE1982 wrote: | | BALZTOWAL wrote: | | I think the legislatures made it illegal to hunt El Toro. |
they did... |
It's been a few years since I hunted El Toro. But I would still want to see the docs.
Most land along bodies of water are subject to changing boundries. Do we have any legal eagle types on this board? |
As I understand it anything below mean high tide level is legal. _________________ "Ya'll must eat a lot of fish" |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Uncle D Full Grown Flour Bluffian

Joined: 14 Mar 2006 Posts: 1645 Location: Third Coast
|
Posted: Mon Feb 21, 2011 10:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
| topdog15 wrote: |
As I understand it anything below mean high tide level is legal. |
Some years ago, I talked to the head of the GIS dept. at A&M CC about a similar issue. A buddy and his group were hunting duck in the water adjacent to a ranchers property. Wardens issued tickets. Found out this was a spot the wardens like to hunt. Anyway GIS guy said to establish property boundaries along coastal waterways, it would take years( 5 or so) to study tide cycles, then determine the actual boundaries. So the jest was there is no way anyone can claim trespassing unless the property is always high and dry.
Don't take this to the bank though, I've slept since then but you get the idea. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|