HACKED BY CYBER-ATTACK - ALPERENBTN Forum Index HACKED BY CYBER-ATTACK - ALPERENBTN
HACKED BY CYBER-ATTACK - ALPERENBTN
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

New redfish Regulations

 
This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    HACKED BY CYBER-ATTACK - ALPERENBTN Forum Index -> HACKED FOR ISLAM AND HZ.MOHAMMED
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
CCKAYAKER
Finger Mullet


Joined: 01 Jun 2005
Posts: 55
Location: Flour Bluff

PostPosted: Wed Nov 09, 2005 10:58 pm    Post subject: New redfish Regulations Reply with quote

Days of tags could be over, check out this article from the "award winning smaller crimes"
Dont agree with none of it cept the flounder possesion,






State looks at fishing changes
November 3, 2005

In addition to deciding future policy on seagrass preservation today in Austin, Texas Parks & Wildlife commissioners are expected to start a process that could result in several changes to our fishing regulations.

None of the fisheries changes would be decided this week. I'll tell you later how they voted.

Among the proposals is one that would do away with the annual oversized-redfish tag. The current rule allows anglers to keep two so-called oversized red drum within a license year in addition to a three-fish daily allotment.

Instead, under this proposal we'd be allowed to keep one redfish greater than 28 inches each day that we fish.

One option would allow this oversized redfish to be part of a three-fish daily bag. Another option would allow the oversized redfish to be taken in addition to a three-fish daily bag.

I'm unsure why TPW wouldn't simply increase by one fish the daily bag on slot-size reds (20-28 inches). I get the sense that many oversized redfish that are killed by anglers end up in the garbage. Adding an edible-size redfish as part of a four-fish daily bag would help prevent at least some of this waste. But this option isn't on the table.

If given the go ahead by commissioners, one of these two options would enter the public-input process and ultimately could be adopted or killed at a later date.

Another proposal involving redfish would allow guides to keep a limit of redfish during charter trips. Currently, guides may not retain any fish regulated by a daily limit during charter trips. But this is a relatively new regulation.



I spoke with the TPW today and they said this topic would be under " Public Discussion" on their website soon. They would tell the results of the meeting.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
CCKAYAKER
Finger Mullet


Joined: 01 Jun 2005
Posts: 55
Location: Flour Bluff

PostPosted: Wed Nov 09, 2005 10:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

They would NOT tell me the results of the meeting on the 3rd.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    HACKED BY CYBER-ATTACK - ALPERENBTN Forum Index -> HACKED FOR ISLAM AND HZ.MOHAMMED All times are GMT - 7 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group